Shadowboxing with Syntax

The Economist



Shadowboxing with Syntax

I squared up to a sentence tonight—
chin tucked, comma loose in my mouthguard.

Syntax circled, light on its clauses,
jabbing with a subordinate I never saw coming.
I countered with a metaphor—wild swing, too ornate—
and kissed the canvas of my own ambition.

The crowd of blank pages roared (very quietly).

I danced on the balls of my parentheses, ducked under a dangling modifier,
let a semicolon split the round
like a diplomatic handshake between ideas that refuse to share a locker room.

We clinched in the corner—
me whispering, “flow,”
it whispering, “order.”
Its footwork was elegant, ruthless; mine was mostly enthusiasm.

By round three I was shadowboxing myself—
throwing haymakers at echoes, calling it craft.
Syntax leaned on the ropes, patient as gravity.

The bell rang—a period, decisive.

I raised my gloves to the mirror, split lip of hubris,
grinning through the grammar.
Tomorrow, we train again—
lighter on my feet, heavier on the truth.

-----

This poem's title is the sixth line from one of my earlier poems, that poem was made up of incomplete sentences, that somehow made great titles.
-----
Shared with DVerse Poets Pub for Open Link Night.

©2026 Christopher Reilley 

I would love to know what you thought about this piece. 
Please consider leaving a comment.

Comments

  1. Chris, I knew there would be a bell in there. I love all of the action going on in here. Feels like Rocky against Apollo, glove and glove.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You had me at the title , love all the word match. Training for the next poem indeed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The poet as a Muhammed Ali? I can cheer for that!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your shadowboxing with syntax made me smile, Chris. My dad was a boxer, so I understood the boxing terms, and being a linguist, ex-teacher and poet, I always enjoy your ars poetica. I especially enjoyed these lines:
    ‘Syntax circled, light on its clauses,
    jabbing with a subordinate I never saw coming’
    and
    ‘I danced on the balls of my parentheses, ducked under a dangling modifier,
    let a semicolon split the round’.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I love your poetry a lot, especially those almost mechanical meta parts of it. As an IT student I also love the language a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Works so well... I wonder if we shouldn't fight with grammar in the next round.

    ReplyDelete
  7. What a glorious write, Chris! I am a huge fan of your poetry.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts